narrowly drawn
Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court
Definitions from Case Law
From 561 U.S. 1 - Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project · 2010Most cited · 464 citing opinions
further a "compelling state interest" by the least restrictive means (internal quotation marks omitted)); "Turner, supra, "at 189 (requiring "advance[ment of] important governmental interests unrelated to the suppression of free speech" without "burdening] substantially more speech than necessary to further those interests"); "Robel, supra, "at 268, n.
20
How often courts cite the cases defining “narrowly drawn”
Court decisions citing the 2 opinions that defined “narrowly drawn” — 903 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining cases as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.
All 2 definitions, chronological · 1996–2010
- 1996·518 U.S. 727 - Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission[p28]· cited 442×ORIGINAL
in context of differential taxation of media); "Sable", "supra", at 126, 131 (applying "compelling interest," "least restrictive means," and "narrowly tailored" requirements to indecent telephone communications); "Turner", 512 U. S., at ___ (slip op., at 16) (using "heightened scrutiny" to address content-neutral regulations of cable system broadcasts); Central Hudson Gas & Elec.