Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Pardon

Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court

Definitions from Case Law

From 80 U.S. 128 - United States v. Klein · 1871Most cited · 654 citing opinions

Pardon includes amnesty

It blots out the offence pardoned and removes all its penal consequences. It may be granted on conditions.

How the Supreme Court has restated “Pardon”

1833184018601880190019201927 most cited: 80 U.S. 128 - United States v. Klein (1871)
first statedrestated (same sense)departed

Each Supreme Court definition of “Pardon,” sized by how often later courts cited it. “Change” is measured by wording overlap with earlier definitions — a rough signal, not a semantic judgment.

How often courts cite the cases defining “Pardon”

183018501900195020002030263

Court decisions citing the 6 opinions that defined “Pardon” — 1,537 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining cases as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.

All 7 definitions, chronological · 1833–1927

  1. ORIGINAL

    A pardon is an act of grace, proceeding from the power intrusted with the execution of the laws, which exempts the individual, on whom it is bestowed, from the punishment the law inflicts for a crime he has committed. It is the private, though official, act of the executive magistrate, delivered to the individual for whose benefit it is intended, and not communicated officially to the court.

    definition and operation

  2. in common parlance or in law. In the first, it is forgiveness, release, remission. Forgiveness for an offence, whether it be one for which the person committing it is liable in law or otherwise. Release from pecuniary obligation, as where it is said, I pardon you your debt. Or it is the remission of a penalty, to which one may have subjected himself by the non-performance of an undertaking or contract, or when a statutory penalty in money has been incurred, and it is remitted by a public functionary having power to remit it.

    common meaning and legal meaning

  3. A pardon is said by Lord Coke to be a work of mercy, whereby the king, either before attainder, sentence or conviction, or after, forgiveth any crime, offence, punishment, execution, right, title, debt or duty, temporal or ecclesiastical… It is frequently conditional, as he may extend his mercy upon what terms he pleases, and annex to his bounty a condition precedent or subsequent, on the performance of which the validity of the pardon will depend… And if the felon does not perform the condition of the pardon, it will be altogether void; and he may be brought to the bar and remanded, to suffer the punishment to which he was originally sentenced.

    Coke's definition

  4. the pardon not merely releases the offender from the punishment prescribed for the offence, but that it obliterates in legal contemplation the offence itself.

  5. A pardon is an act of grace, proceeding from the power intrusted with the execution of the laws, which exempts the individual on whom it is bestowed from the punishment the law inflicts for a crime he has committed. It is the private though official act of the executive magistrate, delivered to the individual for whose benefit it is intended. A pardon is a deed, to the validity of which delivery is essential, and delivery is not complete without acceptance. It may then be rejected by the person to whom it is tendered; and if it be rejected, we have discovered no power in a court to force it on him.

  6. 1927·274 U.S. 480 - Biddle v. Perovich[p4]· cited 145×

    A pardon in our days is not a private act of grace from an individual happening to possess power. It is a part of the Constitutional scheme. When granted it is the determination of the ultimate authority that the public welfare will be better served by inflicting less than what the judgment fixed.