post hoc rationalization
Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court
Definitions from Case Law
From 371 U.S. 156 - Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States · 1962Most cited · 5,662 citing opinions
The courts may not accept appellate counsel's post hoc rationalizations for agency action; Chenery requires that an agency's discretionary order be upheld, if at all, on the same basis articulated in the order by the agency itself: '(A) simple but fundamental rule of administrative law * * * is * * * that a reviewing court, in dealing with a determination or judgment which an administrative agency alone is authorized to make, must judge the propriety of such action solely by the grounds invoked by the agency. If those grounds are inadequate or improper, the court is powerless to affirm the administrative action * * *.
How often courts cite the case defining “post hoc rationalization”
Court decisions citing the opinion that defined “post hoc rationalization” — 5,645 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining case as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.