Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

remote parties

Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court

Definitions from Case Law

From 79 U.S. 181 - Hoffman & Co. v. Bank of Milwaukee · 1870Most cited · 41 citing opinions

bill of exchange

the rule is otherwise between the remote parties to the bill, as, for example, between the payee and the acceptor, or between the indorsee and the acceptor, as two distinct considerations come in question in every such case where the payee or indorsee became the holder of the bill before it was overdue and without any knowledge of the facts and circumstances which impeach the title as between the immediate parties to the instrument. Those two considerations are as follows: First, that which the defendant received for his liability, and, secondly, that which the plaintiff gave for his title, and the rule is well settled that the action between the remote parties to the bill will not be defeated unless there be an absence or failure of both these considerations.

How often courts cite the case defining “remote parties”

187018751900192519501975200010

Court decisions citing the opinion that defined “remote parties” — 39 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining case as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.