requirements contract
Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court
Definitions from Case Law
From 337 U.S. 293 - Standard Oil Co. of California v. United States · 1949Most cited · 1,411 citing opinions
Requirements contracts may well be of economic advantage to buyers as well as to sellers, and thus indirectly of advantage to the consuming public. In the case of the buyer, they may assure supply, afford protection against rises in price, enable long-term planning on the basis of known costs, and obviate the expense and risk of storage in the quantity necessary for a commodity having a fluctuating demand. From the seller's point of view, requirements contracts may make possible the substantial reduction of selling expenses, give protection against price fluctuations, and—of particular advantage to a newcomer to the field to whom it is important to know what capital expenditures are justified—offer the possibility of a predictable market.
How often courts cite the case defining “requirements contract”
Court decisions citing the opinion that defined “requirements contract” — 1,408 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining case as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.