Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Total vs. partial loss

Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court

Definitions from Case Law

From 11 U.S. 415 - Biays v. The Chesapeake Insurance Company · 1813Most cited · 18 citing opinions

memorandum articles

The proposition appears too self evident not to command universal assent, that when only a part of a cargo, consisting all of the same kind of articles, is lost in any way whatever, and the residue, which in this case amounts to much the greatest part, arrives in safety at its port of destination, the loss cannot but be partial, and that this must forever be so, as long as a part continues to be less than the whole.

How often courts cite the case defining “Total vs. partial loss”

1810185019001950200020203

Court decisions citing the opinion that defined “Total vs. partial loss” — 18 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining case as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.