Void vs. voidable judgment
Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court
Definitions from Case Law
From 12 U.S. 9 - Griffith v. Frazier · 1814Most cited · 52 citing opinions
jurisdictional defect
The well known distinction between an erroneous act or judgment by a tribunal having cognizance of the subject matter, and the act or judgment of a tribunal having no cognizance of the subject, is not denied.
How often courts cite the case defining “Void vs. voidable judgment”
Court decisions citing the opinion that defined “Void vs. voidable judgment” — 52 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining case as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.