Appropriation act vs. substantive law
Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court
Definitions from Case Law
From 233 U.S. 509 - United States v. Vulte · 1914Most cited · 88 citing opinions
It is decided that a statute which fixed the annual salary of a public officer at a designated sum without limitation as to time is not abrogated or suspended by subsequent enactments which merely appropriate a less amount for that officer for particular years, and which contained no words that expressly or by clear implication modified or repealed the previous law. ... 'It would be somewhat unusual to find engrafted upon an act making special and temporary appropriation any provision which was to have a general and permanent application to all future appropriations. Nor ought such an intention on the part of the legislature to be presumed, unless it is expressed in the most clear and positive terms.
How often courts cite the case defining “Appropriation act vs. substantive law”
Court decisions citing the opinion that defined “Appropriation act vs. substantive law” — 86 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining case as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.