Bottomry bond vs. implied maritime lien
Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court
Definitions from Case Law
From 59 U.S. 63 - Carrington v. The Brig Ann C. Pratt · 1855Most cited · 29 citing opinions
The contract of hypothecation, by bottomry, under which the money was loaned, is different from that implied by the general admiralty law. In the one case, the money advanced is payable only in the event of the safe arrival of the vessel at the port of destination, the lender taking the responsibility of the sea-risk, and entitled to charge extraordinary interest. … In the other—the case of an implied lien—the obligation to pay the money is absolute; and to secure the payment, the vessel, the credit of the owner and of the master himself, are pledged.
How often courts cite the case defining “Bottomry bond vs. implied maritime lien”
Court decisions citing the opinion that defined “Bottomry bond vs. implied maritime lien” — 29 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining case as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.