Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Implied finding in patent

Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court

Definitions from Case Law

From 242 U.S. 371 - Dickson v. Luck Land Co. · 1917Most cited · 77 citing opinions

There is no mention of his age in the patent, and yet it must be taken as impliedly containing a finding that he was then an adult. This is so, because every patent for public or Indian lands carries with it an implied affirmation or finding of every fact made a prerequisite to its issue ... But such implications, although appropriately and generally indulged in support of titles held under the government's patents, are not regarded as otherwise having any conclusive or controlling force. They are not judgments in the sense of the rules respecting estoppel by judgment.

How often courts cite the case defining “Implied finding in patent”

191019201940196019802000201020

Court decisions citing the opinion that defined “Implied finding in patent” — 77 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining case as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.