Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

involuntary confession

Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court

Definitions from Case Law

From 365 U.S. 534 - Rogers v. Richmond · 1961Most cited · 2,510 citing opinions

convictions following the admission into evidence of confessions which are involuntary, i.e., the product of coercion, either physical or psychological, cannot stand

How the Supreme Court has restated “involuntary confession”

196019701971 most cited: 365 U.S. 534 - Rogers v. Richmond (1961)
first stateddeparted

Each Supreme Court definition of “involuntary confession,” sized by how often later courts cited it. “Change” is measured by wording overlap with earlier definitions — a rough signal, not a semantic judgment.

How often courts cite the cases defining “involuntary confession”

196019802000202020301.6k

Court decisions citing the 4 opinions that defined “involuntary confession” — 6,305 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining cases as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.

All 4 definitions, chronological · 1960–1971

  1. 1960·361 U.S. 199 - Blackburn v. Alabama[p12]· cited 2,222×
    ORIGINAL

    a complex of values underlies the stricture against use by the state of confessions which, by way of convenient shorthand, this Court terms involuntary

  2. 1961·367 U.S. 433 - Reck v. Pate[p17]· cited 1,078×

    the question whether a confession was extracted by coercion does not depend simply upon whether the police resorted to the crude tactic of deliberate physical abuse. The question in each case is whether a defendant's will was overborne at the time he confessed. If so, the confession cannot be deemed 'the product of a rational intellect and a free will.' In resolving the issue all the circumstances attendant upon the confession must be taken into account.

  3. 1971·400 U.S. 446 - Procunier v. Atchley[p14]· cited 498×

    a statement in which 'the will of the defendant had been overborne so that the statement was not his free and voluntary act,' resolved 'in light of the totality of the circumstances