Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

judicial power

Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court

Definitions from Case Law

From 219 U.S. 346 - David Muskrat v. · 1911Most cited · 1,474 citing opinions

cases and controversies

the judicial power, as we have seen, is the right to determine actual controversies arising between adverse litigants, duly instituted in courts of proper jurisdiction. The right to declare a law unconstitutional arises because an act of Congress relied upon by one or the other of such parties in determining their rights is in conflict with the fundamental law.

How the Supreme Court has restated “judicial power”

185818601880190019201930 most cited: 219 U.S. 346 - David Muskrat v. (1911)
first stateddeparted

Each Supreme Court definition of “judicial power,” sized by how often later courts cited it. “Change” is measured by wording overlap with earlier definitions — a rough signal, not a semantic judgment.

How often courts cite the cases defining “judicial power”

18501900195020002030330

Court decisions citing the 4 opinions that defined “judicial power” — 2,118 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining cases as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.

All 4 definitions, chronological · 1858–1930

  1. 1858·62 U.S. 506 - Ableman v. Booth[p43]· cited 321×
    ORIGINAL

    The grant of judicial power is not confined to the administration of laws passed in pursuance to the provisions of the Constitution, nor confined to the interpretation of such laws; but, by the very terms of the grant, the Constitution is under their view when any act of Congress is brought before them, and it is their duty to declare the law void, and refuse to execute it, if it is not pursuant to the legislative powers conferred upon Congress.

  2. 1863·68 U.S. 243 - Ex parte Vallandigham[p10]· cited 66×

    The powers conferred by Congress upon the district judge and the secretary are judicial in their nature, for judgment and discretion must be exercised by both of them, but it is not judicial in either case, in the sense in which judicial power is granted to the courts of the United States. Nor can it be said that the authority to be exercised by a military commission is judicial in that sense. It involves discretion to examine, to decide and sentence, but there is no original jurisdiction in the Supreme Court to issue a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum to review or reverse its proceedings.

    constitutional sense

  3. This Court can have no jurisdiction other than of cases and controversies falling within the classes enumerated in the judiciary article. It cannot give decisions which are merely advisory; nor can it exercise or participate in the exercise of functions which are essentially legislative or administrative.