Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

multiple currency obligation

Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court

Definitions from Case Law

From 307 U.S. 247 - Guaranty Trust Co. v. Henwood · 1939Most cited · 111 citing opinions

the railroad undertook only a single obligation to repay the money it borrowed. Repayment of that money might be called for in any one, but only one, of the five different types of money. This, however, did not divide the railroad's undertaking to repay into five separate and independent obligations to repay the same loan. Payment under the contract in any one of the currencies selected by the bondholder would discharge the entire single obligation of the debtor. Payment in guilders, after payment in guilders was elected, would nonetheless discharge an obligation which prior to such election and payment was an obligation also payable in United States dollars. The language of the Joint Resolution was intended to refer to a monetary obligation in its entirety. That which the Joint Resolution made dischargeable was the debt—the monetary obligation to pay.

How often courts cite the case defining “multiple currency obligation”

19301940196019802000201029

Court decisions citing the opinion that defined “multiple currency obligation” — 111 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining case as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.