Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

one-subject rule

Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court

Definitions from Case Law

From 279 U.S. 340 - Posados v. Warner, Barnes & Co. · 1929Most cited · 75 citing opinions

The purpose is to prevent the inclusion of incongruous and unrelated matters in the same measure and to guard against inadvertence, stealth and fraud in legislation. Courts strictly enforce such provisions in cases that fall within the reasons on which they rest. But the courts disregard mere verbal inaccuracies, resolve doubts in favor of validity, and hold that, in order to warrant the setting aside of enactments for failure to comply with the rule, the violation must be substantial and plain.

How often courts cite the cases defining “one-subject rule”

19201940196019802000202050

Court decisions citing the 2 opinions that defined “one-subject rule” — 105 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining cases as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.

All 2 definitions, chronological · 1929–1929

  1. The purpose of the constitutional provision is 'to prevent the inclusion of incongruous and unrelated matters in the same measure and to guard against inadvertence, stealth, and fraud in legislation.