Physician-patient privilege
Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court
Definitions from Case Law
From 235 U.S. 669 - Arizona & New Mexico Railway Co. v. Clark · 1915Most cited · 58 citing opinions
The chief policy of the statute, as we regard it, is to encourage full and frank disclosures to the medical adviser, by relieving the patient from the fear of embarrassing consequences. The question of dealing justly as between the patient and third parties is a secondary consideration. The statute recognizes that they do not stand on equal terms. The patient is more or less suffering from pain or weakness, distracted by it, ignorant of the nature or extent of his injury or illness, driven by necessity to call in a professional adviser, sometimes with little freedom of choice; he relies, perforce, upon the physician's discretion, as well as upon his skill and experience.
How often courts cite the case defining “Physician-patient privilege”
Court decisions citing the opinion that defined “Physician-patient privilege” — 58 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining case as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.