Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

previous restraint

Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court

Definitions from Case Law

From 310 U.S. 296 - Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · 1940Most cited · 6,192 citing opinions

The availability of a judicial remedy for abuses in the system of licensing still leaves that system one of previous restraint which, in the field of free speech and press, we have held inadmissible. A statute authorizing previous restraint upon the exercise of the guaranteed freedom by judicial decision after trial is as obnoxious to the Constitution as one providing for like restraint by administrative action.

How often courts cite the cases defining “previous restraint”

1940196019802000202020301.6k

Court decisions citing the 2 opinions that defined “previous restraint” — 7,142 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining cases as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.

All 2 definitions, chronological · 1940–1948

  1. it establishes a previous restraint on the right of free speech in violation of the First Amendment which is protected by the Fourteenth Amendment against State action. To use a loud-speaker or amplifier one has to get a permit from the Chief of Police. There are no standards prescribed for the exercise of his discretion. The statute is not narrowly drawn to regulate the hours or places of use of loud-speakers, or the volume of sound (the decibels) to which they must be adjusted.