Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

standing

Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court

Definitions from Case Law

From 368 U.S. 278 - Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange Cty. · 1961Most cited · 902 citing opinions

The controlling question is whether the appellant 'has sustained or is immediately in danger of sustaining some direct injury as the result of (the statute's) enforcement * * *.

How the Supreme Court has restated “standing”

19081910192019301940195019601968 most cited: 368 U.S. 278 - Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange Cty. (1961)
first stateddeparted

Each Supreme Court definition of “standing,” sized by how often later courts cited it. “Change” is measured by wording overlap with earlier definitions — a rough signal, not a semantic judgment.

How often courts cite the cases defining “standing”

1900192519501975200020252030663

Court decisions citing the 4 opinions that defined “standing” — 1,689 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining cases as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.

All 4 definitions, chronological · 1908–1968

  1. The party raising the question of constitutionality and invoking our jurisdiction must be interested in, and affected adversely by, the act, and the interest must by, the decision of the state court be of a personal, and not of an official, nature.

    personal interest

  2. One who would strike down a state statute as obnoxious to the Federal Constitution must show that the alleged unconstitutional feature injures him.

    constitutional challenge to state statute

  3. when the particular statutory provision invoked does reflect a legislative purpose to protect a competitive interest, the injured competitor has standing to require compliance with that provision