Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

cause of action

Defined in 6 dictionaries — Case Law, Cyclopedic (1922), Ballentine's (1916), Bouvier (1914), Black's (1910), Black's (1891)

Definitions from Case Law

From 341 U.S. 6 - American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn · 1951Most cited · 3,597 citing opinions

A cause of action does not consist of facts, but of the unlawful violation of a right which the facts show.

Show all 5 Supreme Court definitions and how they changed over time 1927–1951

The Cyclopedic Law Dictionary

Walter A. Shumaker and George Foster Longsdorf; ed. James C. Cahill · 1922

The thing done or omitted to be done which confers the right upon the other to sue — that is, the wrong against the plaintiff which caused a grievance. Matter for which an action may be brought; the right to maintain an action. 28 Barb. (N. Y.) 231. A cause of action is said to accrue to any person when that person first comes to a right to bring an action. There is, however, an obvious distinction between a cause of action and a right, though a cause of action generally confers a right. Thus, statutes of limitation do not affect the cause of action, but take away the right. It is synonymous with "right of action" (26 How. Pr. [N. Y.] 108), but not with "chose in action" (10 How. Pr. [N. Y.] 1).

Ballentine's Law Dictionary

James A. Ballentine · 1916

A right to sue.

Bouvier's Law Dictionary and Concise Encyclopedia

John Bouvier; revised by Francis Rawle · 1914

In Practice. Matter for which an action may be brought. A cause of action is said to accrue to any person when that person first comes to a right to bring an action. There is, however, an obvious distinction between a cause of action and a right, though a cause of action generally confers a right. Thus, statutes of limitation do not affect the cause of action, but take away the right. A cause of action implies that there is some person in existence who can bring suit and also a person who can lawfully be sued; Douglas v. Beasley, 40 Ala. 148; Parker v. Enslow, 102 111. 272, 40 Am. Rep. 588. See Parish v. Ward, 28 Barb. (N. Y.) 330; 4 Bing. 704; Graham v. Scripture, 26 How. Pr. (N. Y.) 501. When a wrong has been committed, or a breach of duty has occurred, the cause of action has accrued, although the claimant action does not accrue until the existence of such a state of things as will enable a person having the proper relations to the property or persons concerned to bring an action; 5 B. & C. 360; 8 D. & tft. 346; 4 Biugh. 686. "A cause of action consists of those facts' as to two or more persons entitling at leasf" some one of them to a judicial remedy of " some sort against the other, or others, for the redress or prevention of a wrong. It is essential to. the existence of such facts that there should be a right to be violated and a violation thereof. Since those two elements constitute a cause of action, and to satisfy the statute [Code pleading statute as to joinder of action] they must arise out of one or more circumstances called a transaction, the latter is to be viewed as something distinct from the cause of action itself, else the latter could not arise out of the former." Emerson v. Nash, 124 Wis. 369, 102 N. W. 921, 70 L. R. A. 326, 109 Am. St. Rep. 944. Every judicial action has in it certain necessary elements — a primary right belonging to the plaintiff and a corresponding primary right devolving upon the defendant; the wrong done by the defendant, which consists of a breach of such primary right and duty; a remedial right in plaintiff and a remedial duty upon the defendant, and, finally, the remedy or relief itself. Of these the primary right and duty and the delict or wrong constitute the cause of action; Wildman v. Wlldman, 70 Conn. 700, 41 Atl. 1. Stated in brief, a cause of action may be said to consist of a right belonging to the plaintiff and some wrongful act or omission done by defendant by which that right has been violated. Pom. Rem. § 453. It comprises every fact necessary to the right to the relief prayed for; Mc Andrews v. R. Co., 162 Fed. 856, 89 C. C. A. 546. In United States v. Land Co., 192 U. S. 355, 24 Sup. Ct. 266, 48 L. Ed. 476, it was said by Holmes, J.: "The whole tendency of our decisions is to require a plaintiff to try his whole cause of action and his whole case at one time; he cannot even split up his claim (1 Salk. 11; Trask v. R. Co., 2 Allen (Mass.) 331; Freem. Judge [4th Ed.] § 238, 241) and, a fortiori, he cannot divide the grounds of recovery;" and this language is quoted in Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Slaght, 205 U. S. 132, 27 Sup. Ct. 446, 51 L. Ed. 742. Where a party brings an action for a part only of the entire indivisible demand and recovers judgment, he cannot subsequently sue for another part of the same demand; Baird v. U. S., 96 U. S. 432, 24 L. Ed. 703. This rule applies to the foreclosure of a mortgage on several tracts of land; if the mortgagee forecloses as to a portion of the vendor having a lien for the purchase money on lands; if be enforces the lien as to a portion of the land, he may not bring a Second suit; Day v. Preskctt; -40 Ala. Q24. And it was held in Codwise v. Taylor, 4 Sneed (Term.) 346, that if he proceeded to enforce his lien for a portion of the money which is due, he exhausts his remedy as to the rest of the land for that portion of the debt afterwards maturing. But a defendant may not split his counterclaim, using part of it as a defense and then sue on the other part; Palm's Adm'rs v. Howard, 102 S. W. 267, 31 Ky. Law Rep. 316; id.; 102 S. W. 1199, 31 Ky. Law Rep. 814. A suit on a bond and a suit on its coupons are on different causes of action; Presidio County v. Bond & Stock Co., 212 U. S. 58, 29 Sup. Ct. 237, 63 L. Ed. 402. The words "arising out of the same cause of action" In United States admiralty rule 53 are used In a more general sense as meaning the same transaction, dispute or subject matter; United Transp. & Lighterage Co. v. Transp. Line, 185 Fed. 3S8, 107 C. C. A. 442, following Vianello v. The Credit Lyonnais, 15 Fed. 637.

Black's Law Dictionary

Henry Campbell Black, M.A. · 1910

Matter for which an action may be brought. The ground on which an action may be sustained. The right to bring a suit. Cause of action is properly the ground on which an action can be maintained; as when wesay that such a person has no cause of action. But the phrase is often used to signify the matter of the complaint or claim on which a given action is in fact grounded, whether or not legally maintainable. Moziey & Whitley. It sometimes means a person having a right of action. Thus, where a legacy is left to a married woman, and she and her husband bring an action to recover it, she is called in the old books the "meritorious cause of action." 1 H. Bl. 108. The term is synonymous with right of action, right of recovery. Graham v. Scripfure, 26 How. Prae. (N. Y.) 501. Cause of action is not synonymous with chose in action; the latter includes debts, etc., not due, and even stocks. Bank of Commerce v. Rutland & W. R. Co., 10 How. Prac. (N. Y.) i.

A Dictionary of Law

Henry Campbell Black · 1891

Matter for which an action may be brought. The ground on which an action may be sustained. The right to bring a suil. Cause of action is properly the ground oa which an action can be maintained; as when wo say that such a person has no cause of action. But tho phrase is often used to signify the matter of the complaint or claim on which a given action is in fact grounded, whether or not legally maintainable. Mozley & Whitley. It sometimes means a person having a right of action. Thus, where a legacy is left to a married woman, and she and her husband bring an action to recover it, she is called in the old books the “meritorious cause of action.” 1H. Bl. 108. \ Theterm is synonymous with right of action, right of recovery. 26 How. Pr. 501. Cause of action is not synonymous with chose in aciion; the latter includes debts, etc., not due, and even stocks. 10 How, Pr. 1.