combination
Defined in 8 dictionaries — Case Law, Cyclopedic (1922), Ballentine's (1916), Bouvier (1914), Black's (1910), Kinney (1893), Black's (1891), Anderson (1889)
Definitions from Case Law
From 340 U.S. 147 - Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp. · 1950Most cited · 2,618 citing opinions
The conjunction or concert of known elements must contribute something; only when the whole in some way exceeds the sum of its parts is the accumulation of old devices patentable.
The Cyclopedic Law Dictionary
Walter A. Shumaker and George Foster Longsdorf; ed. James C. Cahill · 1922
Ballentine's Law Dictionary
James A. Ballentine · 1916
Bouvier's Law Dictionary and Concise Encyclopedia
John Bouvier; revised by Francis Rawle · 1914
A union of men for the purpose of violating the law. See Strike; Boycott; Restraint of Trade; Conspiracy. A union of different elements. A patent may be taken out for a new combination of existing machines; Moody v. Fiske, 2 Mas. 112, Fed. Cas. No. 9,745. See Patents. C0MBUSTI0 D0M0RUM. Arson. 4 Bla. Com. 272. C0MBUSTI0 PECUNI/E. Burning of money; the ancient method of testing mixed
Black's Law Dictionary
Henry Campbell Black, M.A. · 1910
A conspiracy or confederation of men for unlawful or violent deeds. A union of different elements. A patent may be taken out for a new combination of existing machines. Stevenson Co. v. McFas-sell, 90 Fed. 707, 33 C. C. A. 249; Moore v. Schaw (O. C.) 118 Fed. 602.
— Combination in restraint of trade. A trust, pool, or other association of two or more individuals or corporations having for its object to monopolize the manufacture or traffic in a particular commodity, to regulate or control the output, restrict the sale, establish and maintain the price, stifle or exclude competition, or otherwise to interfere with .the normal course of trade under conditions x>f free competition. Northern Securities Co., v. U. S., 193 U. S. 197, 24 Sup. Ct. 486, 48 L. Ed. 079; U. S. v. Knight Co., 156 U. S. 1, 15 Sup. Ch 249, 39 Lt Ed. 325; Texas Brewing Co. v. Templeman, 90 Tex. 277, 38 S. W. 27 ; U. S. v. Patterson (C. Ct) 55 Fed. 605; State v. Continental Tobacco Co.., 177 Mo. 1, 75 S. W. 737.
A Law Dictionary and Glossary
George C. Kinney · 1893
Union of persons or things; in the law of patents, union of parts, as of machines or machinery.
A Dictionary of Law
Henry Campbell Black · 1891
A conspiracy, or con- A union of different elements. A patent mnay be taken out for a new combination of existing machines. 2 Mason, 112. 'COMBUSTIO. Burning. In old English law, ‘The punishment inflicted upon apostates,
A Dictionary of Law
William C. Anderson · 1889
1. In the law of patents, the union of different elements. A combination is patentableonlj when the several elements of which it is composed produce by their joint action a new and useful result, or an old result in a cheaper or otherwise more advantageous way.^ Limitations and provisos imposed by the inventor will be consti Taed strictly against him, as in the nature of disclaimers.' ' A combination may be infringed when some of its. elements are employed and for others are used mechanical equivalents known to be such when the patent was granted.* See further Noveltv; Equivalent, 2; Patent, 2. 2. In penal and criminal laws (as in a statute providing that one comm^on carrier may not combine with another for any purpose), a coalition, union, mutual agreement, or other blending, for any purpose whatever; as, for creating a monopoly.^ A combination between the mantifacturers of a patented article (a balance shade-roller), intended not to restrict production but simply to maintain a fair and uniform price, and to prevent the injurious effects to producers and consumers of fluctuating prices caused ' Stephen Plead., Tyl. ed., 306, 210. See Gould, PI. 322; 2 Chitty, PI. 655. a Aldrige v. State, 59 Miss. 255(1881), Chalmers, C. J. " Stephenson v. Brooklyn E. Co., 114 U. S. 157 (1885); Thatcher Heating Co. v. Burtis, 121 id. 286, 295 (1887), cases. 4 Sargent v. Hall Safe and Lock Co., 114U. S. 86(1885), cases. s Rowell V. Lindsay, 113 U. S. 102 (1885), cases. See also Booth V. Parks, 1 Flip. 381 (1884), cases; Hill v. Sawyer, 31 F. E. 282 (1887), cases; 20 Wall. 368; 92 U. S. 357; 109 id. 420; 111 id. 103; 17 F. E. 80, cases; 19 id. 509, by undue competition, is not in restraint of trade or against public policy. ^ A combination is criminal whenever the act to be done has a necessary tendency to prejudice the public or to oppress individuals by unjustly subjecting them to the power of the confederates, and giving effect to the purposes of the latter, whether of extortion or mischief. 2 The gist of the offense is the conspiracy. If the motives of the confederates be to oppress, or the means unlawful, or the consequences to others injurious, it is a conspiracy. Thus, a confederation to raise or depress the price of stocks, labor, merchandise, or the natural products, is a conspiracy." A confederation or conspiracy by an associated body of ship-owners, which is calculated to have and has the effect of driving the ships of other persons, and those of the p"laintiff in particular, out of a certain line of trade, — even though the immediate' object be not to injure the plaintiff but to secure to the conspirators a monopoly of the carrying trade between certain ports, — is, or may be, indictable, and therefore actionable, it private and particular damage can be shown. To warrant the court in granting an interim injunction he who complains must show that he has or will sustain "irreparable damage," that is, damage for which he cannot obtain adequate compensation without the special interference of the court.* "If a large number of men, engaged for a certain time, should combine together to violate their contract, and quit their employment together,.. it would surely be a conspiracy to do an unlawful act, though of such a character that, if done by an individual, it would lay the foundation of a civil action only, and not of a criminal prosecution." ^ See Boycotting; Cokspiraot; Strike, 2; Trade, Eestraints; Trades-Unions.