Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

contempt

Defined in 7 dictionaries — Case Law, Cyclopedic (1922), Ballentine's (1916), Bouvier (1914), Black's (1910), Kinney (1893), Burrill (1850)

Definitions from Case Law

From 289 U.S. 1 - Clark v. United States · 1933Most cited · 1,637 citing opinions

Concealment or misstatement by a juror upon a voir dire examination is punishable as a contempt if its tendency and design are to obstruct the processes of justice.

Show all 3 Supreme Court definitions and how they changed over time 1933–1962

The Cyclopedic Law Dictionary

Walter A. Shumaker and George Foster Longsdorf; ed. James C. Cahill · 1922

A willful disregard or disobedience of a public authority, whether judicial or legislative. Contempts are either (1) civil or (2) criminal. (1) Civil contempts are those quasi contempts which consist in failing to do some-, thing which the contemnor is ordered to do for the benefit of another party to a proceeding before the court; while (2) Criminal contempts are all acts in disrespect of the court or of its process obstructing the administration of justice generally, and tending to bring the court into disrepute. Rapalje, Contempt, § 21; 11 Fla. 184; 4 Keyes (N. Y.) 46. Contempts are also classified as (3) Direct contempts, being those committed in the presence of the court or so near as to disturb its proceedings; and (4) Constructive contempts, being those arising from matters not transpiring in court. Rapalje, Contempt, § 23.

Ballentine's Law Dictionary

James A. Ballentine · 1916

Disobedience of court orders or breach of decorum of a court. See 85 Cal. 603, 20 Am. St. Rep. 248, 25 Pac. 256.

Bouvier's Law Dictionary and Concise Encyclopedia

John Bouvier; revised by Francis Rawle · 1914

A wilful disregard or disobedience of a public authority. By the constitution of the United States, each house of congress may determine the rujes of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds, expel a member. The same provision is substantially contained in the constitutions of the several states. The power to make rules carries that of enforcing them, and to attach persons who violate them and punish them for contempts; I Kent 236; State v. Matthews, 37 N. H. 450; 14 East 1. But see 4 Moore, P. C 03; II id. 347. This power of punishing for contempts is confined to punishment during the session of the legislature, and cannot extend beyond it; Anderson v. Dunn, 6 Wheat. (U. S.) 204, 230, 231, 5 L. Ed. 242; Rap. Contempt 2; and it seems this power cannot be exerted beyond imprisonment. It is often regulated by statute; II. S. R. S. §§ 101-103. The arrest of the offending party is made by the sergeant-at-arms, acting by virtue of the speaker's warrant, both in England and the United States; Anderson v. Dunn, 6 Wheat. (U. S.) 204, 5 L. Ed. 242; 10 Q. B. 359. The power of congress to punish for contempt must be found in some express grant in the constitution or be found necessary to carry into effect such powers as are there granted; Kilbourn v. Thompson, 103 U. S. 169, 26 L. Ed. 377; U. S. v. Lee, 106 U. S. 220, 1 Sup. Ct. 240, 27 L. Ed. 171. See Congress. Courts of justice have an inherent power to punish all persons for contempt of their rules and orders, for disobedience of their process, and for disturbing them in their proceedings; S Co. 38 ft; State v. Matthews, 37 N. H. 450; State v. Morrill. 16 Ark. 384; Ex parte Walker, 29 Ala. 81; Kx parte Adams, 25 Miss. 883, 59 Am. Dec. 234; Clark v. People, Breese (111.) 340, 12 Am. Dec. 178; Ex parte Terry, 128 U. S. 289, 9 Sup. Ct. 77, 32 L. Ed. 405; Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co., 194 U. S. 324, 24 Sup. Ct. 665, 48 L. Ed. 997: Kregel v. Bartling. 23 Neb. S48, 37 N. W. 668; Matter of Moore, 63 N. C. 397; People v. Wilson. 64 111. 195, 16 Am. Rep. 52S; Ex parte Wright, 65 Ind. 508. See In re Savin. 131 D. S. 267, 9 Sup. Ct 689, 33 L. Ed. 150; Respublica v. Oswald, 1 Dall. (U. S.) 319, 1 I* Ed. 155; it is said that the legislature cannot restrict the power: Kx parte Mc Cown. 139 N. C. 95, 51 S. E. 957, 2

Black's Law Dictionary

Henry Campbell Black, M.A. · 1910

Contumacy; a wlllful disregard of the authority of a court of justico or legislative body or disobedience to its lawful orders. Contempt of court is committed by a person who does any act in willful contravention of its authority or dignity, or tending to impede or frustrate the administration of justice, or by one who, being under the court's authority as a party to a proceeding therein, willfully disobeys its lawful orders or faila to comply with an undertaking which he has given. Welch v. Barbee, 52 Conn. 147, 52 Am. Rep. 567; Lyon v. Lyon, 21 Conn. 198; Kissel v. Lewis, 27 Ind. App. 302, 61 N. E. 209; Yates v. Lansing, 9 Johns. (N. Y.) 395, 6 Am. Dee, 290; Stuart v. People, 4 111. 395; Gandy v. State, 13 Neb. 445, 14 N. W. 143. Classification. Contempts are of two kinds, direct and constructive. Direct contempts are those committed in the immediate view and presence of the court (such as insulting language or acts of violence) or so near the presence of the court as to obstruct or interrupt the due and orderly course of proceedings. These are punishable summarily. They are also calied "criminal" contempts, but that term is better used in contrast with "civil" contempla. See infra. Ex parte Wright, 65 Ind. 508; State v. McClaugherty, 33 W. Va. 250, 10 S. E. 407; State v. Shepherd, 177 Mo. 205, 76 S. W. 79, 99 Am. St. Rep. 624; Indianapolis Water Co. v. American Strawboard Co. (C. C.) 75 Fed. 975; In re Dili, 32 Kan. 668, 5 Pan. 39, 49 Am. Rep. 505; State v. Hansford, 48 W. Va. 773, 28 S. E. 791; Androscoggin & K. R. Co. v. Androscoggin R. Co., 49 Me. 392. Constructive (or indirect) contempts are those which arise from matters not occurring in or near the presence of the court, but which tend to obstruct or defeat the administration of justice, and the term is chiefly used with reference to the failure or refusal of a party to obey a lawful order, injunction, or decree of the court laying upon him a duty of action or forbearance. Androscoggin & K. R. Co., v. Androscoggin R. Co, 49 Me. 392; Cooper v. People, 13 Colo. 337, 22 Pac. 790, 6 L. R. A. 430; Stuart v. People, 4 111. 395; McMakin v. McMakin, 68 Mo. App. 57. Constructive contempts were formerly calied "consequential," and this term is still in occasional use. Contempts are also classed as civil or criminal. The former are those quasi contempts which consist in the fnilure to do something which the party is ordered by the court to do for the benefit or advantage of another party to the proceeding bsfore the court, while criminal contempts are acts done in disrespect of the court or its process or which obstruct the administration of justice or tend to bring the court into disrespect. A civil contempt is not an offense against the dignity of the court, but against the party in whose behalf the mandate of the court was issued, and a fine is imposed for his indemnity. But criminal contempts are offenses or injuries offered to the court, and a fine or imprisonment is imposed upon the contemnor for the purpose of punishment. Wyatt v. People, 17 Colo. 252, 28 Pac. 961; People v. McKane, 78 Hun, 154, 28 N. Y. Supp. 981; Schreiber v. Mfg. Co., 18 App. Div. 158, 45 N. Y. Supp. 442; Eaton Rapids v. Homer, 126 Mich 52, 85 N. W. 264 ; In re Nevitt, 117 Fed. 448, 54 C. C. A. 622; State v. Shepherd, 177 Mo. 205, 76 S. W. 79, 99 Am. St. Rep. 624.

A Law Dictionary and Glossary

George C. Kinney · 1893

Disobedience or disregard of authority; a disobedience to the rules, orders or process of a court, or a disturbance or interruption of its proceedings, v. Constructive.

A New Law Dictionary and Glossary

Alexander M. Burrill · 1850

[Lat. contemptus.l In practice. A disobedience to the rules, orders or process of a court of justice, or a disturbance or interruption of its proceedings.* 4 Bl, Com. 285. Contempts are either direct, which openly insult or resist the powers of the court, or the persons of the judges who preside there; or consequential, which, (without such gross insolence or direct opposition,) plainly tend to create an universal disregard of their authority. Id, 283, 284. Or they may be divided into such as are committed in the face of the court, (in facie curies,) which are punishable by commitment and fine, and such as are committed out of court, which are punishable by attachment. 1 Tidd's Pract. 479, 480. 4 Bl. Com. 285. 286. 4 Steph. Com. 348—353. See 1 Kent's Com. 300, note. 1 Hil Vs N, Y, Rep, 154. U. S. Dig. and Supplement, Contempt. A party disobeying a rule or process of court is said to be in contempt, 4 Steph, Com, 19. ^QQ Attachment, Commitment,