indebitatus assumpsit
Defined in 6 dictionaries — Case Law, Ballentine's (1916), Black's (1910), Black's (1891), Stimson (1881), Bouvier (1839)
Definitions from Case Law
From 301 U.S. 532 - Stone v. White · 1937Most cited · 921 citing opinions
The action, brought to recover a tax erroneously paid, although an action at law, is equitable in its function. It is the lineal successor of the common count in indebitatus assumpsit for money had and received. Originally an action for the recovery of debt, favored because more convenient and flexible than the common law action of debt, it has been gradually expanded as a medium for recovery upon every form of quasi-contractual obligation in which the duty to pay money is imposed by law, independently of contract, express or implied in fact.
Ballentine's Law Dictionary
James A. Ballentine · 1916
Black's Law Dictionary
Henry Campbell Black, M.A. · 1910
Lat. Being indebted, he promised or undertook. This is the name of that form of the action of assumpsit in which the declaration alleges a debt or obligation to be due from the defendant, and then avers that, in consideration thereof, he promised to pay or discharge the same.
Defined under Indebitatus in Black's Law Dictionary.
A Dictionary of Law
Henry Campbell Black · 1891
Lat. Being indebted, he promised or undertook. This is the name of that form of theaction of assumpsit in which the declaration alleges z debt or obligation to be due from the defendant, and then avers that, in consideration thereof, he promised to pay or diseharge the same,
Glossary of Technical Terms, Phrases, and Maxims of the Common Law
Frederic Jesup Stimson · 1881
I. Being indebted, he undertook, v. Assumpsit. Indebitatus nunquam: never indebted.
A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States
John Bouvier · 1839
remedies, pleadings, is that species of action of assumpsit, in which the plaintiff alleges m his declaration, first a debt, and then a promise in consideration of the debt, that the defendant being indebted ‘he promised the plaintiff to pay him. The promise so laid is generally an implied one only. Vide 1 Chit. Pl. 334; Steph. Pl. 318; Yelv. 21; 4 Co. 92 b. For the history of this form of action, see 3 Reeve’s Hist. Com. Law; 2 Comyn on Contr. 549 to 556; 1 H. Bl. 550, 551; 3; a Bl. Com. 154; Yelv. 70.