Iso U.S

552, 21 Sup. Ct. 474, 45 L. Ed. 663. It was held to be no cause of action to give false evidence negligently but not wilfully or corruptly, whereby the plaintiff was convicted of a criminal offence, the conviction still standing; [1902] 1 K. B. 467; which was based on a long line of authorities ending with Basely v. Mathews, L. R. 2 C. P. 684, which is said to be a novel case, and that there would probably be no cause of action even if the conviction were reversed; 18 L. Q. R. 107- See Perjury. As to the distinction between Evidence, which corresponds with probatlo, and preuve, see Preuve. See, generally, the treatises on Evidence, of Gilbert, Phillipps, Starkie, Roscoe, Swift, Bentham, Macnally, Peake, Greenleaf, WTharton, Stephen, Rice; Wigmore; Chamberlayne; Mc Kelvey; Jones; Best on Presumption;