scienter
Defined in 7 dictionaries — Case Law, Ballentine's (1916), Black's (1910), Kinney (1893), Anderson (1889), Stimson (1881), Abbott (1879)
Definitions from Case Law
From 361 U.S. 147 - Smith v. People of the State of California · 1959Most cited · 2,285 citing opinions
knowledge by appellant of the contents of the book
Ballentine's Law Dictionary
James A. Ballentine · 1916
Black's Law Dictionary
Henry Campbell Black, M.A. · 1910
A Law Dictionary and Glossary
George C. Kinney · 1893
I. I. Knowingly; with knowledge. The word is used in pleading to express knowledge of certain facts essential to a valid ground-i of complaint, and also as the name of that part of a declaration orindictment in which such knowledge is charged. Scienti et volenti non lit injuria, I. An injury is not done to one who ■ knows and wills it
A Dictionary of Law
William C. Anderson · 1889
See Scire, Scienter.
Glossary of Technical Terms, Phrases, and Maxims of the Common Law
Frederic Jesup Stimson · 1881
Knowingly was aware of make him liable;
Dictionary of Terms and Phrases Used in American or English Jurisprudence
Benjamin Vaughan Abbott · 1879
Knowingly; with knowledge. In the Latin forms of declarations and indictments, scienter was the formal and emphatic word used to express knowledge, on the part of a defendant, of certain facts, knowledge of which was an essential part of the wrong or crime charged upon him. Hence it was frequently used, substantively, as the name of that clause of a pleading or indictment which charged such knowledge. Inserting such a clause was called laying the action or the indictment with a scienter. Hence the word, retaining these meanings, has also come to signify, most often, the guilty knowledge itself. Thus, in a criminal prosecution for passing counterfeit money, the word scienter designates both the knowledge of the character of the money which is necessary to constitute the crime, and the averment of such knowledge in the indictment. Scientla utrimque par pares contraheatea facit. Equal knowledge on both sides makes contracting parties equal. Thus a person applying for insurance need not mention what the underwriter knows, or what he ought to know.