Scire Fieri Inquiry

In English law. The name of a writ formerly used to recover the amount of a judgment from an executor. The history of the.origin of the writ is as follows: When, on an execution de bonis testatoris against an executor, the sheriff returned nul Ui bona and also a devastavit, a fieri facias, de bonis propriis, might formerly have been issued against the executor, without a previous inquisition finding a devastavit and a scire facias. But the most usual practice upon the sheriff's return of nulla bona to a fieri facias de bonis testa-^ toris was to sue out a special writ of fieri facias de bonis testatoris, with a clause in it, et si tibi constare, poterit, that the executor had wasted the goods, then to levy de bonis propriis. This was the practice in the king's bench till the time of Charles I. In the common pleas, a practice had prevailed in early times upon a suggestion in the special writ of fieri facias of a devastavit by the executor, to direct the sheriff to inquire by a jury whether the executor had wasted the goods, and if the jury found he had, then a scire facias was issued out against him, and, unless he made a good defense thereto, an execution de bonis propriis was awarded against him. The practice of the two courts being different, several cases were brought into the king's bench on error, and at last it became the practice of both courts, for the sake of expedition, to incorporate the fieri facias inquiry and scire facias into one writ, thence called a "scire fieri inquiry," — a name compounded of the first words of the two writs of scire facias and fieri facias, and that of inquiry, of which it consists. This writ recites the fieri facias de bonis testatoris sued out on the judgment against the executor, the return of nulla bona by of the testator to the value of the debt and damages recovered, commands the sheriff to levy the said debt and damages of the goods of the testator in the hands of the executor, if they could be levied thereof;. but if it should appear to him by the inquisition of a jury that the executor had wasted the goods of the testator, then the sheriff is to warn the executor to appear, etc. If the judgment had been either by or against the testator or intestate, or both, the writ of fieri facias recites that fact, and also that the court had adjudged, upon a scire facias to revive the judgment, that the executor or administrator should have execution for the debt, etc. Clift, Entr. 659; Lilly, Entr. 664. Although this practice is sometimes adopted, yet the most usual proceeding is by action of debt on the judgment, suggesting a devastavit, because in the proceeding by scire fieri inquiry the plaintiff is not entitled to costs unless the executor appears and pleads to the scire facias. 1 Saund. 219, note 8. See 2 Archb. Prac. 934.

In English Law. The name of a writ formerly used to recover the amount of a judgment from an executor. The history of the origin of the writ is as follows: When on. an execution de bonis trstatons against an executor the sheriff returned nulla bona and also a devastavit, a fien facias de boms propriis might formerly have been issued against the executor, without a previous inquisition finding a devastavit and a scire facias. But the most usual practice upon the sheriff’s return of nulla bona to a fieri facias de bonis testatoris was to sue out a special writ of fieri facias de bonis testatoris, with a clause in it, “et si tibi constare potent ” that the executor had wasted the goods, then to levy de bonis propriis. This was the practice in the king’s bench till the time of Charles I. In the common picas a practice had prevailed in early times upon a suggestion in the special writ of fieri facias of a devastavit by the executor, to direct the sheriff to inquire by a jury whether the executor had wasted the goods, and if the jury found he had, then a scire facias was issued out against him, and, unless he made a good defence thereto, an execution de bonis propriis was awarded against him. The practice of the two courts being different, several cases were brought into the king’s bench on error, and at last it became the practice of both courts, for the sake of expedition, to incorporate the fieri facias inquiry, and scire facias, into one writ, thence called a scire fieri inquiry,— a. name compounded of the first words of the two writs of scire facias and fieri facias, and that of inquiry, of which it consists. This writ recites the fieri facias de bonis testatoris sued out on the judgment against the executor, the return of nulla bona by the sheriff, and then, suggesting that the executor had sold and converted the goods of the testator to the value of the debt and damages recovered, commands the sheriff to levy the said debt and damages of the goods of the testator in the hands of the executor, if they could be levied thereof, but if it should etc. If the judgment had been either by or against the testator or intestate, or both, the writ of fieri facias recites that fact, and also that the court had adjudged, upon a scire facias to revive the judgment, that the executor or administrator should b^ve execution for the debt, etc. Clift, Entr. 669; Lilly, Entr. 664. Although this practice is sometimes adopted, yet the most usual proceeding is by action of debt, on the judgment, suggesting a devastavit because in the proceeding by scire fieri inquiry the plaintiff is not entitled to costs unless the executor appears and pleads to the scire facias; 1 Saund. 219, n. 8. See 2 Archb. Pr. 934.