taxes
Defined in 3 dictionaries — Case Law, Ballentine's (1916), Bouvier (1839)
Definitions from Case Law
From 147 U.S. 190 - Illinois Cent Co v. City of DecaturMost cited · 87 citing opinions
burdens, charges, or impositions put or set upon persons or property for public uses, and this is the definition which Lord Coke gives of the word 'talliage,'
Ballentine's Law Dictionary
James A. Ballentine · 1916
A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States
John Bouvier · 1839
This term in its most extended sense includes all contributions imposed by the government upon individuals for the service of the state, by whatever name they are called or known, whether by the name of tribute, tithe, talliage, impost, duty, gabel, custom, subsidy, aid, supply, excise, or other name. The 8th section of art. 1, Const. U. S. provides, that ‘congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay,” &c. ‘ But all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States.” In the sense above mentioned, taxes are usually divided into two great classes, those which are direct, and those which are indirect. Under the former denonimation are included taxes on land or real property, and under the latter taxes on articles of consumption. 5 Wheat. R. 317. Congress have plenary power overevery species of taxable property, except exports. But there are tworules prescribed for their government, the rule of uniformity and the rule of apportionment. Three kinds of taxes, namely, duties, imposts and excises are to be rule. Should there be any other apecies of taxes, not direct, and not included within the words duties, imposts or customs, they might be laid by the rule of uniformity or not, as congress should think proper and reasonable. Ib. The word taxes is, in a more confined sense, sometimes applied in contradistinction to duties, imposts and excises. Vide, generally, Story on the Const. ch. 14; 1 Kent, Com. 254; 3 Dall. 171; 1 Tuck. Black. App. 232; 1 Black. Com. 308; The Federalist, No. 21, 86; Woodf. Landl. and Ten. 197, 254.