universities
Defined in 2 dictionaries — U.S. Code, Bouvier (1914)
United States Code
22 U.S.C. § 2220A — as used in this subpart (7 versions over time)
As used in this subpart, the term “universities” means those colleges or universities in each State, territory, or possession of the United States, or the District of Columbia, now receiving, or which may hereafter receive, benefits under the Act of July 2, 1862 (known as the First Morrill Act) [7 U.S.C. 301 et seq.], or the Act of August 30, 1890 (known as the Second Morrill Act) [7 U.S.C. 321 et seq.], which are commonly known as “land-grant” universities; institutions now designated or which may hereafter be designated as sea-grant colleges under the Act of October 15, 1966 (known as the National Sea Grant College and Program Act) [33 U.S.C. 1121 et seq.], which are commonly known as sea-grant colleges; Native American land-grant colleges as authorized under the Equity in Educational Land-Grant Status Act of 1994 (7 U.S.C. 301 note); and other United States colleges and universities which—
(1) have demonstrable capacity in teaching, research, and extension (including outreach) activities in the agricultural sciences; and
(2) can contribute effectively to the attainment of the objectives of this subpart.
Bouvier's Law Dictionary and Concise Encyclopedia
John Bouvier; revised by Francis Rawle · 1914
Courts of local jurisdiction, resembling borough courts, in and for the two Universities of Oxford and Cambridge in England. 3 Bla. Com. 83. These are courts subsisting under ancient charters granted to these universities and confirmed by act of parliament. If the defendant be a member of the University of Oxford resident within its limits, the suit must be in this court, although the plaintiff is not connected with the university or resident there, and although the cause of action did not arise within its limits; Odgers, C. L. 1030, citing 16 Q. B. D. 761. The rule at Cambridge is the same, except that the privilege cannot be claimed if any person not a member of the university be a party. The University of Oxford claims a similar privilege in criminal matters when any member of the university, resident within its limits, is defendant or prosecutor; Odgers, C. L. 1030; 4 Inst. 227; Rep. *. Hardw. 341; 2 Wils. 406; 12 East 12; 13 id. 635; 15 id. 634; 10 Q. B. 292. This privilege of exclusive jurisdiction was granted in order that the students might not be distracted from their studies and other scholastic duties by legal process from distant courts. The most ancient charter containing this grant to the University of Oxford was 28 Hen. III. a. d. 1244, and the privileges thereby granted were confirmed and enlarged by every succeeding prince down to Hen. VIII., in the 14th year of whose reign the largest and most extensive charter of all was granted, and this last-mentioned charter is the one now governing the privileges of that university. A charter somewhat similar to that of Oxford was granted to Cambridge in the third year of Elizabeth. And subsequently was passed the statute of 13 Eliz. c. 29, whereby the legislature recognized and confirmed all the charters of the two universities, and those of the 14 Henry VIII. and 3 Eliz. by name (13 Eliz. c. 29); 16 Q. B. D. 761 (Oxford), 12 East 12 (Cambridge), which act established the privileges of these universities without any doubt or opposition. members who are defendants, and when an action in the High Court is brought against such member the university enters a claim of conusance, that is, claims the cognizance of the matter, whereupon the action is withdrawn from the High Court and transferred to the University Court; 16 Q. B. D. 761. Procedure in these courts was usually regulated according to the laws of the civilians, subject to specific rules made by the vicechancellor, with the approval of three of his Majesty's judges. See (as to Oxford) 25 & 26 Vict, c 26, § 12. Under the charter of Henry VIII. the chancellor and vicechancellor and the deputy of such vicechancellor are justices of the peace for the counties of Oxford and Berks, which jurisliction was confirmed in them by 49 & 50 Vict. c. 31; 3 Steph. Com. 325. The judge of the chancellor's court at Oxford was a vice-chancellor, with a deputy or assessor. An appeal lay from his sentence to delegates appointed by the congregation, thence to delegates appointed by the house of convocation, and thence, in case of any disagreement only, to judges delegates appointed by the crown under the great seal in chancery; 3 Steph. Com., 11th ed. 325.