Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Ala. Code § 8-22-2

Legislative Findings.

Known as the Motor Fuel Marketing Act

The act spans §§ 8–8 (18 sections).

Applied in 5 court decisions — leading case Home Oil Co., Inc. v. Sam's East, Inc. (2002)

Most recently applied in Parish Oil Co. v. Dillon Companies, Inc. (April 2008)

(Acts 1984, No. 84-260, p. 433, §2; Act 2015-225, §1.)

How often courts cite this section

198519902000200820
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

The Legislature makes the following findings with respect to the marketing of motor fuel in Alabama:

(1) Marketing of motor fuel is affected with the public interest.

(2) Unfair competition in the marketing of motor fuel occurs whenever costs associated with the marketing of motor fuel are recovered from other operations, allowing the refined motor fuel to be sold at subsidized prices. Such subsidies most commonly occur in one of three ways: when refiners use profits from refining of crude oil to cover below normal or negative returns earned from motor fuel marketing operations; and where a marketer with more than one location uses profits from one location to cover losses from below-cost selling of motor fuel at another location.

(3) Independent motor fuel marketers (i.e., dealers, distributors, jobbers, and wholesalers) are unable to survive predatory subsidized pricing at the marketing level by persons when all of an independent’s income comes from marketing operations.

(4) Subsidized pricing is inherently predatory and is reducing competition in the petroleum industry, and if it continues unabated, will ultimately threaten the consuming public.

Official source: Alabama Legislature (ALISON). Reproduced from public-domain Alabama statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.