Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Ark. Code Ann. § 16-111-108

Supplementary relief

Applied in 5 court decisions — leading case Yamauchi v. Sovran Bank/Central South (1992)

Most recently applied in Altice USA, Inc., D/B/A Suddenlink Communications v. City of Gurdon, Arkansas Ex Rel. Honorable Sherry Kelley, Mayor, Individually and on Behalf of a Class of Similarly Situated Cities (November 2022)

Acts 1953, No. 274, § 7; A.S.A. 1947, § 34-2507.

How often courts cite this section

19881990200020102020202210
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

Further relief based on a declaratory judgment or decree may be granted whenever necessary or proper. The application therefor shall be by petition to a court having jurisdiction to grant the relief. If the application be deemed sufficient, the court shall, on reasonable notice, require any adverse party whose rights have been adjudicated by the declaratory judgment or decree, to show cause why further relief should not be granted forthwith.

Current official text: Arkansas General Assembly. Digitized from the UniCourt Code Improvement Commission public-domain capture. Reproduced from public-domain Arkansas statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.