Assignments
Applied in 2 court decisions — leading case Perryman v. Hackler (1996)
Most recently applied in Scenic Holding, LLC v. New Board of Trustees of Tabernacle Missionary Baptist Church, Inc. (November 2007)
Civil Code, §§ 26, 27; Acts 1873, No. 88, § 1 [26], p. 213; C. & M
(1) When the assignment is not authorized by statute, the assignor must be a party as plaintiff or defendant.
(2) Where the right of the plaintiff is transferred or assigned during the pendency of the action, it may be continued in his or her name, or the court may allow the person to whom the transfer or assignment is made to be substituted in the action, proper orders being made as to security for the costs.
Current official text: Arkansas General Assembly. Digitized from the UniCourt Code Improvement Commission public-domain capture. Reproduced from public-domain Arkansas statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.