Judgments set off against each other
Applied in 1 court decision — leading case Roberts v. Feltman (1996)
Most recently applied in Roberts v. Feltman (November 1996)
Civil Code, § 409; C. & M
(1) Judgments for the recovery of money may be set off against each other, having due regard to the legal and equitable rights of all persons interested in both judgments.
(2) The setoff may be ordered upon motion after reasonable notice to the adverse party, where both judgments are in the same court, or in an action for equitable relief in the court in which the judgment sought to be annulled by the setoff was rendered.
Current official text: Arkansas General Assembly. Digitized from the UniCourt Code Improvement Commission public-domain capture. Reproduced from public-domain Arkansas statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.