Probation generally — Restitution
Applied in 6 court decisions — leading case Turman v. State (2015)
Most recently applied in 2026 Ark. App. 51 - Mayra Lopez (Aka Myria Lopez) v. State of Arkansas (January 2026)
Acts 2011, No. 570, § 90.
Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.
If the court has suspended imposition of sentence or placed a defendant on probation conditioned upon the defendant's making restitution and the defendant has not satisfactorily made all of his or her payments when the probation period has ended, the court may:
(1) Continue to assert the court's jurisdiction over the recalcitrant defendant; and
(2) Either: Extend the probation period as the court deems necessary; or
(3) Revoke the defendant's suspended sentence.
Current official text: Arkansas General Assembly. Digitized from the UniCourt Code Improvement Commission public-domain capture. Reproduced from public-domain Arkansas statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.