A.R.S. § 12-686

Inadmissible evidence

Applied in 2 court decisions — leading case Herndon v. Seven Bar Flying Service, Inc. (1983)

Most recently applied in Herndon v. Seven Bar Flying Service, Inc. (September 1983)

In any product liability action, the following shall not be admissible as direct evidence of a defect:

1. Evidence of advancements or changes in the state of the art subsequent to the time the product was first sold by the defendant.

2. Evidence of any change made in the warnings, design or methods of manufacturing or testing the product or any similar product subsequent to the time the product was first sold by the defendant.

Official source: Arizona State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Arizona statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.