Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

A.R.S. § 32-1153

Proof of license as prerequisite to civil action

Applied in 20 court decisions — leading case Marston's Inc. v. Roman Catholic Church of Phoenix (1982)

Most recently applied in Snider v. Dickinson Elks Building, LLC (February 2018)

How often courts cite this section

196719701980199020002010201830
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

No contractor as defined in section 32-1101 shall act as agent or commence or maintain any action in any court of the state for collection of compensation for the performance of any act for which a license is required by this chapter without alleging and proving that the contracting party whose contract gives rise to the claim was a duly licensed contractor when the contract sued upon was entered into and when the alleged cause of action arose.

Official source: Arizona State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Arizona statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.