A. A lien or security interest on behalf of the landlord in the tenant's household goods is not enforceable unless perfected before the effective date of this chapter.
B. Distraint for rent is abolished.
Landlord liens; distraint for rent abolished
Applied in 1 court decision — leading case Gordon v. James (1989)
Most recently applied in Gordon v. James (August 1989)
A. A lien or security interest on behalf of the landlord in the tenant's household goods is not enforceable unless perfected before the effective date of this chapter.
B. Distraint for rent is abolished.
Official source: Arizona State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Arizona statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.