Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

A.R.S. § 33-722

Election between action on debt or to foreclose

Applied in 5 court decisions — leading case United States v. Dos Cabezas Corp. (1993)

Most recently applied in Royal Palm Corporate Center Ass'n v. PNC Bank, NA (March 2012)

How often courts cite this section

199020002010201220
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

If separate actions are brought on the debt and to foreclose the mortgage given to secure it, the plaintiff shall elect which to prosecute and the other shall be dismissed.

Official source: Arizona State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Arizona statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.