This article shall be applied and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of this article among those states that enact it. It is the intent of the legislature that in construing this article, the courts may use as a guide interpretations given by the federal courts to comparable federal antitrust statutes.
A.R.S. § 44-1412
Uniformity
Applied in 12 court decisions — leading case Bunker's Glass Co. v. PILKINGTON, PLC (2003)
Most recently applied in In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig. (April 2019)
How often courts cite this section
Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.
Official source: Arizona State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Arizona statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.