Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

A.R.S. § 47-2202

Final written expression: parol or extrinsic evidence

Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case Ucc v. P Dar Apollo Group Inc

Most recently applied in 26 Ucc rep.serv.2d 1099, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,249, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8478 Apollo Group, Inc., an Arizona Corporation v. Avnet, Inc., a New York Corporation Dba Hamilton/avnet Computers (June 1995)

Terms with respect to which the confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or which are otherwise set forth in a writing intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement with respect to such terms as are included therein may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement but may be explained or supplemented:

1. By course of performance, course of dealing or usage of trade (section 47-1303); and

2. By evidence of consistent additional terms unless the court finds the writing to have been intended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement.

Official source: Arizona State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Arizona statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.