Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 404.1

Coordination

Applied in 1 court decision — leading case Briggs v. Merck Sharp & Dohme (2015)

Most recently applied in Briggs v. Merck Sharp & Dohme (August 2015)

Added by Stats. 1972, Ch. 1162.

Coordination of civil actions sharing a common question of fact or law is appropriate if one judge hearing all of the actions for all purposes in a selected site or sites will promote the ends of justice taking into account whether the common question of fact or law is predominating and significant to the litigation; the convenience of parties, witnesses, and counsel; the relative development of the actions and the work product of counsel; the efficient utilization of judicial facilities and manpower; the calendar of the courts; the disadvantages of duplicative and inconsistent rulings, orders, or judgments; and, the likelihood of settlement of the actions without further litigation should coordination be denied.

Official source: California Legislative Information. Reproduced from public-domain California statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.