Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 22a-19

Administrative proceedings

Known as the Environmental Protection Act

The act spans §§ 22–22 (122 sections).

Applied in 14 court decisions — leading case Medical Waste Associates, Inc. v. Maryland Waste Coalition, Inc. (1992)

Most recently applied in 2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 1396 - Rya Corp. v. Enfield Pzc, No. Cv-01-0805349s (Jan. 16, 2003) (January 2003)

(1971, P.A. 96, S. 6; P.A. 06-196, S. 256; P.A. 13-186, S. 1.) History: P.A. 06-196 made a technical change in Subsec

How often courts cite this section

198619902000200340
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

(a)(1) In any administrative, licensing or other proceeding, and in any judicial review thereof made available by law, the Attorney General, any political subdivision of the state, any instrumentality or agency of the state or of a political subdivision thereof, any person, partnership, corporation, association, organization or other legal entity may intervene as a party on the filing of a verified pleading asserting that the proceeding or action for judicial review involves conduct which has, or which is reasonably likely to have, the effect of unreasonably polluting, impairing or destroying the public trust in the air, water or other natural resources of the state.

(2) The verified pleading shall contain specific factual allegations setting forth the nature of the alleged unreasonable pollution, impairment or destruction of the public trust in air, water or other natural resources of the state and should be sufficient to allow the reviewing authority to determine from the verified pleading whether the intervention implicates an issue within the reviewing authority's jurisdiction. For purposes of this section, “reviewing authority” means the board, commission or other decision-making authority in any administrative, licensing or other proceeding or the court in any judicial review.

(b) In any administrative, licensing or other proceeding, the agency shall consider the alleged unreasonable pollution, impairment or destruction of the public trust in the air, water or other natural resources of the state and no conduct shall be authorized or approved which does, or is reasonably likely to, have such effect as long as, considering all relevant surrounding circumstances and factors, there is a feasible and prudent alternative consistent with the reasonable requirements of the public health, safety and welfare.

Official source: Connecticut General Assembly. Reproduced from public-domain Connecticut statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.