Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-572g

Defenses against holder in due course of instrument in consumer goods credit transaction

Applied in 1 court decision — leading case Valentin v. Community Remodeling, No. X01 Cv 02 0172325 S (Jan. 15, 2003) (2003)

Most recently applied in Valentin v. Community Remodeling, No. X01 Cv 02 0172325 S (Jan. 15, 2003) (January 2003)

(1972, P.A. 137; P.A. 73-466; P.A. 75-251; P.A. 76-169, S. 14; P.A. 77-604, S. 35, 84; P.A. 82-160, S. 240; P.A. 01-132, S. 176.) History: P.A. 73-466 added Subsecs

(a) Any holder in due course of a promissory note, contract or other instrument, other than an instrument issued in connection with a credit card transaction, evidencing an indebtedness, signed or executed by a buyer in connection with a credit transaction covering consumer goods, as defined in section 42a-9-102 or for consumer services rendered, shall be subject to all of the claims and defenses which the buyer has against the seller arising out of the transaction or against the person or persons providing the services, limited to the amount of indebtedness then outstanding in connection with the credit transaction, provided the buyer shall have made a prior written demand on the seller with respect to the transaction.

(b) For the purposes of this section “consumer services” includes any supply of accommodations, exercise and health club programs, instruction or education, including any type of training course in any field such as personality improvement, self motivation, salesmanship and similar fields, or any work, repair or other services rendered for personal, family or household purposes.

Official source: Connecticut General Assembly. Reproduced from public-domain Connecticut statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.