Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Fla. Stat. § 674.103

Variation by agreement; measure of damages; action constituting ordinary care

Known as the Uniform Commercial Code

The act spans §§ 674.101 to 674.504 (41 sections).

Applied in 4 court decisions — leading case Lamm ex rel. Ira v. State Street Bank & Trust (2014)

Most recently applied in Gilbert & Caddy, P.A. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (June 2016)

History.--s. 1, ch. 65-254; s. 9, ch. 92-82

How often courts cite this section

2014201620
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

(1) The effect of the provisions of this chapter may be varied by agreement, but the parties to the agreement cannot disclaim a bank’s responsibility for its lack of good faith or failure to exercise ordinary care or limit the measure of damages for the lack or failure. However, the parties may determine by agreement the standards by which the bank’s responsibility is to be measured if those standards are not manifestly unreasonable.

(2) Federal Reserve regulations and operating circulars, clearinghouse rules, and the like have the effect of agreements under subsection (1), whether or not specifically assented to by all parties interested in items handled.

(3) Action or nonaction approved by this chapter or pursuant to Federal Reserve regulations or operating circulars is the exercise of ordinary care; and, in the absence of special instructions, action or nonaction, consistent with clearinghouse rules and the like or with a general banking usage not disapproved by this chapter is prima facie the exercise of ordinary care.

(4) The specification or approval of certain procedures by this chapter is not disapproval of other procedures that may be reasonable under the circumstances.

(5) The measure of damages for failure to exercise ordinary care in handling an item is the amount of the item reduced by an amount that could not have been realized by the exercise of ordinary care. If there is also bad faith, it includes any other damages the party suffered as a proximate consequence.

Official source: Online Sunshine (Florida Legislature). Reproduced from public-domain Florida statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.