Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Fla. Stat. § 849.26

Gambling contracts declared void; exception

Applied in 5 court decisions — leading case Schrenger v. Caesars Indiana (2005)

Most recently applied in Tabas v. Lehman (In re Capitol Investments, Inc.) (June 2012)

History.--s. 1, ch. 26543, 1951.

How often courts cite this section

196819701980199020002010201220
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

All promises, agreements, notes, bills, bonds or other contracts, mortgages or other securities, when the whole or part of the consideration if for money or other valuable thing won or lost, laid, staked, betted or wagered in any gambling transaction whatsoever, regardless of its name or nature, whether heretofore prohibited or not, or for the repayment of money lent or advanced at the time of a gambling transaction for the purpose of being laid, betted, staked or wagered, are void and of no effect; provided, that this act shall not apply to wagering on pari-mutuels or any gambling transaction expressly authorized by law.

Official source: Online Sunshine (Florida Legislature). Reproduced from public-domain Florida statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.