(a) All contemporaneous writings shall be admissible to explain each other.
(b) Parol evidence shall be admissible to explain all ambiguities, both latent and patent.
O.C.G.A. § 24-3-3
Contemporaneous writings explaining each other; parol evidence explaining ambiguities
Applied in 1 court decision — leading case Espy v. Massac (2006)
Most recently applied in Espy v. Massac (April 2006)
Agreements: Restating the Parol Evi- Code 1981, § 24-3-3, enacted by Ga
Current official text: Official Code of Georgia Annotated (LexisNexis). Digitized from the Internet Archive scan of the OCGA. Reproduced from public-domain Georgia statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.