Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Idaho Code § 18-2401

Consolidation of theft offenses

Known as the Unused Merchandise Ownership Protection Act

The act spans §§ 18–18 (21 sections).

Applied in 5 court decisions — leading case Jones v. State (1985)

Most recently applied in State of Iowa v. Betty Ann Nall (May 2017)

I.C., § 18-2401, as added by 1981, ch. 183, § 2, p. 319.

How often courts cite this section

1985199020002010201720
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

(1) Conduct denominated theft in this chapter constitutes a single offense superceding the separate offenses previously known as embezzlement, extortion, false pretenses, cheats, misrepresentations, larceny and receiving stolen goods.

(2) An accusation of theft may be supported by evidence that it was committed in any manner that would be theft under this chapter, notwithstanding the specification of a different manner in the indictment, information or complaint, subject only to the power of the court to ensure fair trial by granting a continuance or other appropriate relief where the conduct of the defense would be prejudiced by lack of fair notice or by surprise.

Current official text: Idaho Statutes (Idaho Legislature). Digitized from the UniCourt Code Improvement Commission public-domain capture. Reproduced from public-domain Idaho statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.