Sec. 1. This article does not apply to:
(1) an adoption proceeding; or
(2) a proceeding pertaining to the authorization of emergency medical care for a child.
Inapplicability
Applied in 2 court decisions — leading case Raymond C. Tisdale v. Christine M. (Tisdale) Bolick (2012)
Most recently applied in Joel Zivot v. Pamela London (December 2012)
As added by P.L.138-2007, SEC.45.
Sec. 1. This article does not apply to:
(1) an adoption proceeding; or
(2) a proceeding pertaining to the authorization of emergency medical care for a child.
Official source: Indiana General Assembly. Reproduced from public-domain Indiana statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.