Provision that contract subject to laws of another state void
Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case MPACT Construction Group, LLC v. Superior Concrete Constructors, Inc. (2004)
Most recently applied in 390 F. Supp. 3d 946 - J3 Eng'g Grp., LLC v. Mack Indus. of Kalamazoo, LLC (July 2019)
As added by P.L.2-2002, SEC.13.
Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.
Sec. 17. A provision in a contract for the improvement of real estate in Indiana is void if the provision:
(1) makes the contract subject to the laws of another state; or
(2) requires litigation, arbitration, or other dispute resolution process on the contract occur in another state.
Official source: Indiana General Assembly. Reproduced from public-domain Indiana statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.