When after the occurrence of an event remedial or precautionary measures are taken, which, if taken previously would have tended to make the event less likely to occur, evidence of such subsequent measures is not admissible to prove negligence or culpable conduct in connection with the event.
K.S.A. 60-451
Subsequent remedial conduct
Applied in 1 court decision — leading case Ranches v. City and County of Honolulu (2007)
Most recently applied in Ranches v. City and County of Honolulu (October 2007)
L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-451; January 1, 1964.
Official source: Kansas Office of Revisor of Statutes. Reproduced from public-domain Kansas statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.