Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

K.S.A. 84-2-202

Final written expression: Parol or extrinsic evidence

Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case Betaco, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co. (1994)

Most recently applied in Speth v. Whitham Farms Feedyard, L.P. (In Re Sunbelt Grain WKS, LLC) (June 2009)

L. 1965, ch. 564, § 26; L. 2007, ch. 89, § 34; July 1, 2008.

How often courts cite this section

19942000200910
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

Terms with respect to which the confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or which are otherwise set forth in a writing intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement with respect to such terms as are included therein may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement but may be explained or supplemented:

(a) By course of performance, course of dealing or usage of trade (K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 84-1-303 , and amendments thereto); and

(b) by evidence of consistent additional terms unless the court finds the writing to have been intended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement.

Official source: Kansas Office of Revisor of Statutes. Reproduced from public-domain Kansas statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.