Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

KRS 369.105

Use of electronic records and electronic signatures -- Variation by agreement

Known as the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act

The act spans §§ 369–369 (26 sections).

Applied in 1 court decision — leading case Diane Wells v. Craig & Landreth Cars, Inc. (2012)

Most recently applied in Diane Wells v. Craig & Landreth Cars, Inc. (April 2012)

Effective: August 1, 2000 History: Created 2000 Ky

(1) KRS 369.101 to 369.120 does not require a record or signature to be created, generated, sent, communicated, received, stored, or otherwise processed or used by electronic means or in electronic form.

(2) KRS 369.101 to 369.120 applies only to transactions between parties each of which has agreed to conduct transactions by electronic means. Whether the parties agree to conduct a transaction by electronic means is determined from the context and surrounding circumstances, including the parties' conduct.

(3) A party that agrees to conduct a transaction by electronic means may refuse to conduct other transactions by electronic means. The right granted by this subsection may not be waived by agreement.

(4) Except as otherwise provided in KRS 369.101 to 369.120, the effect of any of its provisions may be varied by agreement. The presence in certain provisions of KRS 369.101 to 369.120 of the words "unless otherwise agreed," or words of similar import, does not imply that the effect of other provisions may not be varied by agreement.

(5) Whether an electronic record or electronic signature has legal consequences is determined by KRS 369.101 to 369.120 and other applicable law.

Official source: Kentucky General Assembly. Reproduced from public-domain Kentucky statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.