Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

KRS 523.050

Inconsistent statements

Applied in 1 court decision — leading case Commonwealth v. Thurman (1985)

Most recently applied in Commonwealth v. Thurman (June 1985)

Effective: January 1, 1975 History: Created 1974 Ky

(1) When a person has made inconsistent statements under oath, both having been made within the period of the statute of limitations, the prosecution may proceed by setting forth the inconsistent statements in a single charge alleging in the alternative that one (1) or the other was false and not believed by the defendant. In such case it shall not be necessary for the prosecution to prove which statement was false but only that one (1) or the other was false and not believed by the defendant to be true.

(2) The highest offense of which a person may be convicted in such an instance shall be determined by hypothetically assuming each statement to be false. If perjury of different degrees would be established by the making of the two (2) statements, the person may only be convicted of the lesser degree. If perjury or false swearing would be established by the making of the two (2) statements, the person may only be convicted of false swearing.

Official source: Kentucky General Assembly. Reproduced from public-domain Kentucky statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.